Tonight, I saw King Kong. Tonight, I'm writing this while the experience is still fresh in my mind.
To start with, the movie is 3 hours long. That's too long, and too boring and too blah.
Why? Why remake this film? This question I have been asking since I heard Peter Jackson was planning on following up his Lord of the Rings trilogy with a King Kong remake. However, it got good ratings from the professional critics, so I went to see it with an open mind and optimistic spirit.
After seeing the film, I still don't know the answer to that question. There's spoilers ahead, so don't read ahead if you want to be surprised by the ending.
Other things I don't understand are listed as follows in no particular order:
1. What is Kong's motivation for carrying Ann (
Naomi Watts) around? Does he want a meal? He doesn't eat her given many chances. He apparently tore his previous victims limb from limb and likely ate them. Does he want a mate? Poor girl if that's the case. Does he want a friend? That's not a nice way to treat a friend, crushing them in your big paws and throwing her around like a ragdoll. Does he want a pet? Perhaps that the answer. No one else on the island, or New York seems to like the brute.
2. I always assumed that if three T-Rex chomped on someone's arm or leg, the arm or leg would come off. Apparently, Kong's arms are made of stronger sinew than lesser apes. His stay on, and with no significant bloodloss, he's fine to keep running, girl in paw.
3. Why would a T-Rex with a mouthful of elephant sized dinosaur drop that meal to chase after a rather skinny girl?
4. Can an island the size of Skull Island really support the feeding habits of three large T-Rex and lots of raptors and a herd of Brontosaurus?
5. Why does
Jack Black always have that goofy half-grin on his face?
The film could have been made an hour shorter without missing out on anything important or interesting. Many scenes, especially the T-Rex scene went on far too long. I consider it a personal victory that I was able to stay awake throughout the entire movie.
Many scenes looked quite fake. In particular, any scene where Kong is picking Ann up, or putting Ann down, or shaking Ann violently half-to-death while not bruising her, or rupturing her spinal cord, or making her dizzy, looks fake. Ann looks fake like a Barbie, and so does Kong (not like a Barbie, but still with a plastic like quality).
Sounds like I didn't care for King Kong. There were some good things about it. As many scenes that looked really fake, some scenes looked very very good too. Naomi Watts was very good. Adrian Brody did a good job. The recreating of New York City in the 1930's was very nicely done.
Wait for it play on TV in a year or two. Perhaps the network will edit where Jackson couldn't or wouldn't.
My rating is 2.5 / 5 rating units.
Oh yeah, I promised a spoiler. In the end, King Kong dies.